Judge Faith Season 2 Episode 119 Impound Pain | Another One Bites the Dust

In this episode of Judge Faith, titled "Impound Pain | Another One Bites the Dust," two cases are presented to Judge Faith: one involving a car that was wrongly impounded, and the other involving a dispute over a property that was sold.

In the first case, a woman claims that her car was impounded unjustly and is seeking reimbursement for the costs she incurred. She explains that she had parked her car on the street and left it there for several days while she was out of town. When she returned, she found that her car had been towed and impounded by the city. When she went to retrieve it, she was told that it had been impounded because it was parked in a "no parking" zone, but she insists that there were no signs indicating that the area was off-limits. She argues that the city acted arbitrarily in impounding her car and that she should be compensated for the money she spent to get it back.

The defendants in this case, representatives from the city, argue that the woman should have known better than to park her car in an area where it was likely to be towed. They argue that the "no parking" zone was clearly marked and that the woman was at fault for not paying attention to the signs. They also argue that the city had every right to impound the car, and that they should not be held responsible for any costs incurred by the woman.

In the second case, a man is suing his former business partner over the sale of a property. The man explains that he and his partner had jointly purchased a piece of property with the intention of developing it and selling it for a profit. However, when the time came to sell the property, the partner listed it without the man's knowledge and sold it for a price that was far below market value. The man argues that this was a breach of their agreement and that he is entitled to compensation for the lost profits.

The defendant in this case, the former partner, argues that he acted in good faith and that the sale of the property was necessary in order to cover their debts. He argues that he had no choice but to sell it at a lower price than they had originally intended, and that he had the right to do so without consulting the man. He also argues that the man is entitled to only a portion of the profits, rather than the full amount.

Throughout the episode, Judge Faith listens carefully to both sides of each case and asks probing questions in order to get to the heart of the matter. She weighs the evidence presented by both parties and strives to make a fair and just ruling that takes into account all of the facts of the case.

Ultimately, the outcome of each case is left to Judge Faith's discretion. The decisions she makes will not only impact the lives of the litigants involved, but also serve as an example of how the justice system can work to resolve disputes and bring closure to those who have been wronged.