Independent Lens Season 17 Episode 11 (T)ERROR
- February 22, 2016
-
6.5 (12)
In the season 17, episode 11 of Independent Lens, viewers are introduced to the world of counterterrorism investigations and the often controversial methods employed by law enforcement agencies. The episode is titled "(T)ERROR" and explores the story of an FBI informant who goes by the name Saeed 'Shariff' Torres.
The episode focuses on Torres' mission to root out potential terrorists, and the role he plays as an informant for the FBI. Using hidden cameras and audio equipment, Torres infiltrates the lives of people he suspects of having ties to extreme Islamic groups. Through this undercover work, he hopes to gather information that can be used to stop future terror attacks.
Viewers are introduced to a man named Khalifah Al-Akili who Torres is suspicious of. He believes Al-Akili is part of a jihadist group and begins to gather evidence. However, as the investigation continues, questions arise regarding the legitimacy of Torres' investigation methods. Is he infringing on people's privacy and manipulating situations to fabricate evidence? Is the FBI simply using these methods as a way to justify their own existence?
As the tension builds, Torres and Al-Akili's relationship becomes more complex. Torres must balance his loyalty to the FBI with the relationships he's formed with the people he's investigating. The audience is left questioning both the morality and legality of the situation, as well as the effectiveness of such investigations.
The episode explores these complex issues through interviews with Torres himself, as well as experts in the field of counterterrorism and civil liberties. It brings to light the challenges that law enforcement agencies face in their efforts to prevent attacks, while also highlighting the importance of protecting constitutional rights.
Overall, "(T)ERROR" is a thought-provoking and intense episode that delves into the complicated world of counterterrorism investigations and the use of undercover informants. It raises important questions about the balance between safety and civil liberties and leaves viewers with a lot to contemplate.