Ep 2. You Sold Me A Dead Woman's Car; MMA Fight To Get My Money

In this episode of Judge Faith, a man named Robert sues another man named Calvin for selling him a car that belonged to a deceased woman and had numerous mechanical issues. Robert claims that he was unaware of the car's history and that the seller, Calvin, knowingly deceived him. The car broke down shortly after Robert purchased it, and he spent thousands of dollars trying to fix it.

Calvin argues that he disclosed all of the car's issues to Robert prior to the sale and that Robert knew what he was getting into. He claims that Robert even test drove the car and inspected it thoroughly before purchasing it. Ultimately, the two men cannot come to an agreement, and they turn to Judge Faith for help.

As the trial progresses, Judge Faith attempts to uncover the truth about the car's history and the extent of the seller's responsibility to disclose its issues. She also examines the language and representation used in the sales contract and investigates whether or not the buyer was actively deceived. Both parties present their evidence and testimonies, and Judge Faith must determine who is responsible for the car's issues and if any reparations should be made.

In addition to the car sale dispute, the episode also features another case involving a MMA fighter who is seeking payment from his former manager. The fighter claims that his manager failed to pay him for several fights and that he is owed a significant amount of money. The manager contends that the fighter breached his contract and terminated their agreement prematurely, thus negating any payment that would have been due.

Judge Faith examines the terms of the fighter's contract and determines whether or not the manager had a legal obligation to pay him for the fights in question. She also evaluates the quality of representation the fighter received and whether or not the termination of the contract was justified.

Throughout the episode, Judge Faith uses her legal expertise and no-nonsense attitude to guide the conversations and uncover the truth. Her rulings are fair and based on the evidence presented, making for a captivating and informative courtroom experience.