Judge Mathis Season 19 Episode 116 Episode 116

Judge Mathis is a popular reality courtroom show where Judge Greg Mathis presides over small claims cases in a non-traditional manner. Judge Mathis hears cases involving disputes between individuals ranging from minor confrontations to larger legal conflicts. The show offers viewers a chance to see a real courtroom process with real people and real disputes being resolved.

Season 19, Episode 116 of Judge Mathis follows a similar pattern, dealing with the usual small claims disputes. The episode begins with a case involving two young women who've been friends since the fourth grade when they were paired together for a class project. The plaintiff is suing for a $2,500 debt that the defendant fails to pay back, despite numerous promises to do so. The defendant admits to owing money, but claims that she's just been going through some tough times and hasn't been able to pay the plaintiff back. The judge uncovers some surprising revelations as he balances the conflicting arguments and reaches a verdict.

The second case revolves around an alleged car crash that took place between a plaintiff and a defendant. The plaintiff is claiming that the defendant was at fault for the accident, and is seeking damages to cover the cost of repairs. The defendant is refuting the claim, stating that he wasn't even present during the accident. The judge calls for testimony from both parties and attempts to piece together what really happened using available evidence. He offers his insights and counsel on how to handle these types of conflicts in a productive manner.

Following this, the third case involves a mother-son dispute over the sale of a car. The son had contacted an auto dealer to help him sell his car. The mother claims that the son hadn't informed her of the sale or secured her consent, and is claiming a share of the sale's proceeds. The son repudiates the claim and argues that the mother wasn't involved in the transaction, and has no valid claim. Judge Mathis discusses family disputes and how to solve them, and finally adjudicates the case.

The fourth case is about two cousins who are suing each other over a miniature version of a car. The plaintiff had borrowed the toy from the defendant and returned it damaged. The defendant claimed that he would need additional money to repair the damage, which infuriated the plaintiff. Both parties argue, pointing fingers at each other while Judge Mathis mediates. The judge attempts to resolve the conflict and restore their family relationship.

Finally, the episode concludes with a fifth case that revolves around a landlord-tenant dispute. The plaintiff, who is the tenant, claims that the defendant, the landlord, hadn't properly maintained the apartment. The defendant counters that everything was fine, and that the tenant didn't pay their rent. Both parties tell their stories to the judge, who tries to figure out who is telling the truth, and concludes on a note of legal justice.

Judge Mathis is an entertaining and instructive legal program that deals with various types of disputes with professionalism, insight, and wit. With a track record of 19 seasons and over 3,000 episodes, this show has become a popular choice for people watching daytime TV. Episode 116 is no exception to the show's legacy, and it offers engaging courtroom interactions and exciting verdicts. The show provides a unique perspective on legal proceedings, and we recommend it for anyone who's interested in legal disputes and the law.