Judge Mathis Season 23 Episode 36 Episode 36

Judge Mathis is a popular court show that has been on the air for 23 seasons. In season 23, episode 36, viewers are in for a treat with an engaging case that will test the limits of Judge Mathis's patience and legal savviness.

The episode features a plaintiff who is suing his former landlord for damages and stolen property after he was evicted from his apartment. The plaintiff claims that the landlord wrongfully withheld his security deposit, which he needs to pay for his new apartment, and that the landlord took several of his possessions, including a television and a gaming console. The plaintiff is seeking $5,000 in damages.

The defendant, the former landlord, denies any wrongdoing. He claims that the plaintiff violated his lease by causing damage to the apartment and failing to pay rent. He also says that the plaintiff abandoned the apartment without giving proper notice, which voided his right to the security deposit. The defendant says he was legally entitled to keep the deposit and sell the plaintiff's possessions to cover the unpaid rent.

As the case unfolds, Judge Mathis listens attentively to both sides while peppering them with questions and legal insights. He is patient and respectful to both parties, even though they get emotional at times. He uses his vast knowledge of landlord and tenant law to clarify the legal issues and bring out the facts.

The plaintiff presents evidence of photos and receipts of the damaged items in the apartment, as well as emails and text messages that he claims show that he gave notice of his intent to move out and to get his deposit back. He also brings a witness, his cousin, who testifies that he saw the defendant take the plaintiff's belongings out of the apartment while the plaintiff was at work.

The defendant, meanwhile, argues that the plaintiff never informed him of the damage or the intent to move out, and that he only found out after the plaintiff was already gone. He also shows pictures of the damaged walls and a toilet that he says the plaintiff broke. He claims that he gave the plaintiff ample opportunities to pay the rent and fix the damage before resorting to eviction and seizing his property.

Judge Mathis carefully examines the evidence and the testimony, pointing out inconsistencies and contradictions on both sides. He grills the plaintiff on why he did not report the damage and the theft to the police or the landlord immediately, and why he did not keep a copy of the notice he allegedly sent. He also challenges the defendant on why he did not provide a written notice of eviction and why he did not account for the security deposit in a timely manner, as required by law.

Despite the contentious nature of the case, Judge Mathis remains calm and impartial throughout. He reminds both parties of their rights and responsibilities under the law, and encourages them to find a way to settle the dispute amicably. He also praises the plaintiff for his efforts to improve his life and overcome addiction, and urges him to stay on the right track.

In the end, Judge Mathis renders a verdict that surprises both sides. He finds that both the plaintiff and the defendant made mistakes and violated the lease, but that the defendant had no right to keep the security deposit and sell the plaintiff's property without proper notice and accounting. He orders the defendant to pay $2,500 in damages to the plaintiff, but also warns the plaintiff that he needs to be more responsible and honest in his dealings with others, and to seek help if he relapses.

Overall, season 23 episode 36 of Judge Mathis is a compelling and enlightening legal drama that showcases the skills and wisdom of Judge Mathis and the challenges of resolving disputes in court. The episode will leave viewers thinking about the importance of communication, trust, and fairness in everyday life.