Mind Field Season 2 Episode 1 The Greater Good
- December 6, 2017
-
8.9 (190)
In Mind Field Season 2 Episode 1, titled "The Greater Good," host Michael Stevens explores the concept of group conformity and the potential dangers it can pose to individuals and society as a whole.
The episode begins with a classic social psychology experiment known as the Asch conformity test, in which participants are asked to match the length of a line to three comparison lines. The catch is that everyone else in the room is giving the wrong answer on purpose, and the participants must decide whether to go along with the group or trust their own judgment.
From there, the episode delves into the phenomenon of "groupthink," in which a group's desire for unanimity and harmony can override critical thinking and lead to poor decision-making. To illustrate this, Stevens uses the example of the Challenger space shuttle disaster, in which NASA engineers failed to heed the warnings of a few dissenting voices and launched the shuttle despite the presence of a faulty O-ring.
Stevens also looks at the role of authority figures in promoting conformity, discussing the infamous Stanford prison experiment and the Milgram obedience studies in which participants were asked to administer increasingly painful electric shocks to another person under the guidance of an authority figure.
In addition to these classic experiments, the episode also explores more recent research on group conformity and how it plays out in the digital age. Stevens interviews a social media influencer who explains the pressure to conform to certain beauty standards, as well as a group of activists who work to combat fake news and conspiracy theories online.
Throughout the episode, Stevens presents a balanced view of the dangers and benefits of group conformity. On the one hand, he acknowledges the many instances in which conformity has led to disastrous outcomes, from the Holocaust to the Jonestown massacre. On the other hand, he notes that conformity can sometimes be a force for good, such as when people come together to protest injustice or work towards a common goal.
Ultimately, the episode challenges viewers to question their own tendency to conform, highlighting the importance of critical thinking and independent judgment in a world that often values conformity above all else.