Judge Mathis Season 18 Episode 117 Episode 117

Judge Mathis is a courtroom reality series that revolves around the presiding judge Greg Mathis who listens to various cases presented in front of him and delivers his verdict in the light of evidence and arguments presented by the claimants and defendants respectively. In the 117th episode of the 18th season, we see another set of interesting cases that explore different facets of human behavior and decision-making.

One of the cases presented in this episode is about a couple of homeowners who believe that their handyman owes them money for the incomplete and improper work that he did at their place. The claimants argue that they had hired the handyman for fixing a leak in their roof, but he ended up damaging their tiles and causing further damage to their roof than it already had. Furthermore, they allege that the handyman kept on postponing the work and making excuses, even after receiving partial payments from them. The handyman, on the other hand, argues that he did his best to fix the roof, and the damages were already there before him. He, therefore, denies the claim of owing any money to the homeowners.

Another case presented in the episode is about a dispute between a tenant and her landlord. The tenant alleges that her lease agreement was breached when the landlord failed to provide her with a habitable place to live. She argues that the landlord did not take care of the bed bugs infestation and mold in her apartment, and it was affecting her health. Furthermore, she alleges that the landlord was harassing her and even entered her apartment without her permission. The landlord, on the other hand, argues that the tenant was responsible for the bed bugs infestation and that she had not paid her rent on time. She, therefore, denies any wrongdoing and argues that the tenant should pay for her rent as per the lease agreement.

In a third case presented in the episode, we see a dispute between two friends who entered into a business partnership. The claimant alleges that he had invested a significant amount of money into the partnership, but the defendant had misused the money and dragged the business to the ground. He, therefore, claims that the defendant owes him the money that he had invested and the profits that the business had made as per their agreement. The defendant, however, argues that the claimant had also misused the funds and that the business had failed due to their joint negligence. Furthermore, she alleges that the claimant had taken the money and run away without the defendant getting any of the profit they had made.

Overall, the 117th episode of the 18th season of Judge Mathis offers an interesting mix of cases that explore different aspects of human relationships and their legal implications. The cases presented are relatable and offer an insight into the complex dynamics that exist among individuals and groups. The show provides a platform for people to share their stories and seeks to deliver justice in an objective and impartial manner. It is an engaging and thought-provoking show that enables viewers to reflect on their beliefs and values and encourages them to think critically about their own actions.