Judge Mathis Season 20 Episode 133 Episode 133

Judge Mathis is a popular courtroom TV show that features former Detroit-area district court judge, Greg Mathis, presiding over a range of legal disputes. The cases presented in each episode vary widely in nature, with some involving simple small claims issues and others dealing with more complex matters such as insurance fraud, property disputes, and personal injury lawsuits.

Season 20 of Judge Mathis has been no exception to this pattern, with a diverse mix of cases being aired throughout the season's run. Episode 133, in particular, promises to be a compelling installment of the series, with several legal disputes set to be adjudicated in front of Judge Mathis.

As with all episodes of the show, the cases featured in Episode 133 have all been filed as small claims in various district courts across the United States. The show brings these cases to a national audience, allowing viewers to see how Judge Mathis navigates the complexities of each dispute and ultimately arrives at his verdict.

The first case to be heard in Episode 133 concerns a dispute between two former friends who had jointly owned a car which was involved in a serious accident. The plaintiff in the case claims that his former friend was responsible for causing the accident through reckless driving, and is seeking compensation for the resulting damages to the car.

The defendant, on the other hand, claims that he was not driving the car at the time of the accident and therefore should not be held liable for the damages. He also alleges that the plaintiff has been harassing him and making false accusations since the accident occurred.

Judge Mathis will need to carefully weigh the evidence presented by both parties in order to determine who was responsible for the accident and whether compensation is owed to the plaintiff.

The second case featured in Episode 133 concerns a disagreement between a landlord and tenant over the return of a security deposit. The plaintiff had rented an apartment from the defendant for several years before moving out and requesting the return of her security deposit.

The defendant, however, claims that the plaintiff caused significant damage to the apartment and therefore is not entitled to the return of her deposit. The plaintiff disputes these allegations and argues that any damage to the apartment was caused by normal wear and tear over time.

Judge Mathis will need to examine the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the defendant has a valid claim against the plaintiff for damages. If not, he will need to decide whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of her security deposit in full.

The final case presented in Episode 133 concerns a dispute between a woman and her former employer over unpaid wages. The plaintiff alleges that she was not paid the full amount owed to her for work she completed while employed by the defendant.

The defendant, however, claims that the plaintiff was fired for cause and therefore is not entitled to any additional compensation. He also alleges that the plaintiff was dishonest and stole from the company while she was employed there.

Judge Mathis will need to examine the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the plaintiff is owed any additional compensation. He will also need to consider whether the allegations made against the plaintiff are supported by sufficient evidence.

Overall, Episode 133 of Judge Mathis promises to be a compelling installment of the long-running courtroom series. Viewers can expect to see Judge Mathis carefully weigh the evidence presented in each case and arrive at a fair and just verdict in each dispute.