Judge Mathis Season 20 Episode 34 Episode 34

Judge Mathis season 20 episode 34, titled "Episode 34," is a legal reality television show that follows Judge Greg Mathis, a retired Michigan District Court judge, as he presides over various small claims court cases. In this episode, Judge Mathis hears cases from individuals who have come to his courtroom seeking restitution for a range of grievances.

The first case involves a woman who is suing her former roommate for unpaid rent and damages to their apartment. She explains that her former roommate had not only fallen behind on rent payments, but also caused significant damage to the apartment by hosting loud parties and vandalizing the property. The defendant argues that she should not be held responsible for the damages, claiming that the plaintiff had also contributed to the destruction of the apartment. Judge Mathis listens to both sides of the story before rendering his decision.

In the second case, two siblings are at odds over money that was left to them by their deceased father. The plaintiff alleges that her brother had improperly taken funds from their father's estate without her permission. The brother denies any wrongdoing, arguing that the money in question was rightfully his. As both parties present their evidence, Judge Mathis must determine whether the brother had acted inappropriately and decide how to distribute the funds.

The third case involves a dispute over a car that was purchased by the plaintiff from the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the car had mechanical issues that were not disclosed at the time of purchase, and that the defendant had failed to uphold promises made about fixing the problems. The defendant contends that he had made all necessary repairs prior to selling the car and that the plaintiff was simply trying to back out of the purchase agreement. Judge Mathis must decide whether the plaintiff is owed restitution for the defective car and any expenses incurred as a result.

Finally, the fourth case involves a landlord-tenant dispute. The plaintiff, who was renting a property from the defendant, claims that the landlord had failed to make necessary repairs to the apartment and had ultimately forced her to vacate the premises. The defendant argues that the plaintiff had not paid rent on time and was in breach of their rental agreement. Judge Mathis must determine whether the landlord had acted appropriately and whether the plaintiff is owed compensation for her inconvenience.

Throughout the episode, Judge Mathis provides guidance and recommendations for each of the plaintiffs and defendants, advising them on ways to resolve their disputes amicably and avoid future issues. His no-nonsense approach to justice ensures that each case is heard fairly and equitably, and his years of experience on the bench make him a highly respected figure in the courtroom.

In conclusion, Judge Mathis season 20 episode 34, titled "Episode 34," features a range of small claims court cases that test Judge Mathis's judicial expertise and ability to render fair and just decisions. Each case presents unique challenges and requires Judge Mathis to use all of his legal knowledge and common sense to determine the best course of action. With his calm and measured demeanor, Judge Mathis serves as a shining example of what it means to be a good judge.