Judge Mathis Season 20 Episode 37 Episode 37

Judge Mathis season 20 episode 37 features the honorable Judge Greg Mathis presiding over a civil case involving two parties. The episode opens with the plaintiff, Mr. Johnson, presenting his case before the court. Mr. Johnson is suing the defendant, Ms. Smith, for damages resulting from a car accident. Mr. Johnson alleges that Ms. Smith is responsible for the damage to his vehicle, as well as the medical bills that resulted from the accident.

Ms. Smith, the defendant in the case, denies that she is responsible for the accident. She claims that Mr. Johnson was tailgating her and that he caused the accident when he rear-ended her car. Ms. Smith argues that Mr. Johnson should be responsible for the damage to her vehicle and any injuries sustained in the accident.

As the case proceeds, the judge listens carefully to the testimony of both parties. Mr. Johnson presents evidence to support his claim that Ms. Smith is responsible for the accident. He shows photographs of his damaged vehicle and medical bills that he incurred as a result of the accident. Ms. Smith, in turn, presents evidence to support her claim that Mr. Johnson caused the accident. She provides photographs of her car and medical bills of her own.

During the course of the trial, Judge Mathis asks probing questions of both parties to try to get to the truth of the matter. He examines the evidence presented by each side and weighs the credibility of the witnesses. He also listens to the arguments of the attorneys representing each party.

As the trial comes to a close, Judge Mathis makes his ruling. He carefully explains his decision and the reasoning behind it. He takes into account all of the evidence presented, as well as the testimony of the witnesses.

Overall, Judge Mathis season 20 episode 37 provides an insight into the workings of a civil trial in the American justice system. The episode demonstrates the importance of evidence, credibility, and the role of the judge in making fair and impartial decisions. It also highlights the need for parties to be represented by competent legal counsel, and the importance of preparation and presentation in court.