Judge Mathis Season 20 Episode 51 Episode 51

Judge Mathis is a popular courtroom TV show where cases are arbitrated by retired Michigan 36th District Court judge, Greg Mathis. Episode 51 of Season 20 of Judge Mathis focuses on a range of cases, where litigants come to the courtroom seeking justice and wanting their cases to be heard.

In the first case, the plaintiff is suing the defendant for $1,000, relating to an electronic device that was damaged while in the defendant's possession. The defendant argues that the device was already damaged before they'd borrowed it. Judge Mathis delves deep into the evidence in order to determine who is responsible for the damage of the electronic device and the subsequent repairs.

The second case sees a plaintiff suing their ex-boyfriend for multiple expenses, estimated to be around $4,000. The plaintiff is alleging that the defendant incurred several debts, such as cell phone bills and car expenses, that they promised to pay but failed to fulfill their obligations. The defendant, however, argues that they're not obligated to pay for these expenses as they were not incurred when the plaintiff was still in a relationship with them. Judge Mathis questions the facts presented by both parties and makes a ruling based on his assessment of the credibility of both of them.

Next, we have a case where the plaintiff is suing the defendant for $999 that they claim is owed to them as the cost of used kitchen appliances they sold to the defendant. The defendant, on the other hand, says that they already paid the plaintiff for these appliances and also repaired them. Judge Mathis goes through the evidence provided by both the parties to arrive at a fair and just decision.

In the fourth case, the plaintiff is suing the defendant for $520 that they claim they loaned to the defendant more than two years ago. The defendant has made several promises to repay the loan, but they haven't fulfilled their promise to pay it back. The defendant, however, claims that he has already paid back the loan, a stance that is contested by the plaintiff. Judge Mathis looks at the evidence presented by both parties and makes a ruling based on his understanding of their arguments.

Finally, we see a case where the plaintiff is suing the defendant for $2,100 and the return of some personal items. The plaintiff, who is also the ex-girlfriend of the defendant, is accusing the defendant of stealing money from her and also taking her laptop without her permission. The defendant, however, claims that the money and the laptop were a gift that the plaintiff had given him during the relationship. Judge Mathis scrutinizes the facts in the case, looking for a resolution that is fair and just to both parties.

In between the cases, Judge Mathis also shares some personal stories that help shed light on his perspectives and experiences. As always, the conclusion of each case features Judge Mathis rendering a verdict, providing justice to the rightful party. Through his fair and impartial judgements, Judge Mathis manages to provide viewers with an entertaining, educational, and thought-provoking experience.