Judge Mathis Season 20 Episode 77 Episode 77

Judge Mathis is a reality courtroom series airing on syndication. The show features retired Michigan 36th District Court judge, Greg Mathis, presiding over a variety of civil cases brought before him by plaintiffs and defendants. Judge Mathis uses his courtroom experience, street smarts, and quick wit to determine the verdict of each case and dispense justice impartially.

The episode 77 of season 20 of Judge Mathis follows the same format as other episodes of the show, featuring three different cases with unique sets of circumstances and personalities involved. The first case sees a young woman named Tiana bringing her ex-boyfriend DeAngelo to court for unpaid bills. Tiana claims that she had lent DeAngelo over $1,000 for rent and car payments when they were dating, and that he has not paid her back despite promising to do so. DeAngelo, however, argues that the money was given to him as gifts, and that he was not obligated to pay them back. Judge Mathis listens patiently to both sides of the story, getting to the heart of the matter as he digs through the testimony given by both parties. With his legal knowledge and intuition, he tries to determine what exactly happened and how much money DeAngelo owes Tiana.

In the second case, a mother named Janelle files a lawsuit against her son Rayshawn for damaging her car. Janelle claims that Rayshawn borrowed her car on several occasions without asking and returned it with scratches, a broken windshield, and other damages. Rayshawn, on the other hand, denies that he caused the damages and suggests that they may have been present beforehand. Judge Mathis examines the evidence presented by both sides, including photographs of the car, receipts for repairs, and witness statements. He tries to figure out whether Rayshawn is responsible for the damages or if there is another explanation for what happened.

Finally, the third case deals with a couple named Simone and John who are fighting over custody of their dog. Simone claims that John adopted the dog without her consent and that she has been the primary caregiver for the pet. She argues that John does not have the right to take the dog away from her, and that she should be awarded full custody. John, however, argues that he has just as much right to care for the dog as Simone does and that they should share custody. Judge Mathis hears both sides of the argument, delving into the details of the couple's relationship and the role that the dog played in it. He tries to arrive at a verdict that will be fair to both parties while also considering the well-being of the dog.

Overall, episode 77 of Judge Mathis is a compelling and dramatic look at the human drama that unfolds in courtrooms across the country on a daily basis. Through these three unique cases, viewers are given insight into the legal system and the way that judges try to disentangle complex situations and deliver justice for all involved. Judge Mathis' unique blend of intelligence, humor, and compassion make him a beloved figure on television and an inspiration to those who seek to uphold the ideals of justice and fairness in their own lives.