Watch Without Prejudice

Without Prejudice was a Channel 4 game show that ran from 2003 to 2004. It was hosted by Liza Tarbuck and was a unique blend of a quiz show and a reality TV competition. The show featured five contestants who would compete against each other, answering questions in various rounds.

What set Without Prejudice apart from other quiz shows was its unique judging panel. The panel consisted of three members who were given the task of deciding which contestant was the most and least deserving of winning the prize money. The panel wasn't given any information about the contestants, such as their name, age or occupation, and instead were asked to judge them solely on their answers and conduct during the game.

In the first round, the contestants were asked general knowledge questions, and the contestant who answered the most questions correctly was given immunity from elimination in the next round. The remaining contestants then faced off against each other in a debating round, where they were given a topic to debate on, and the panel would decide who gave the most convincing argument.

In the third round, the contestants were given a personal question, such as "what would you do with the prize money?" and were given 30 seconds to answer. This round was particularly interesting as it gave the panel a chance to see how the contestants handled personal questions and how their answers may or may not have changed their opinion of them.

The final two contestants would then compete against each other in a head-to-head round, where they were given a topic to debate on, and the panel would decide who gave the most compelling argument. The winner of the final round won the prize money, and the judge panel would then reveal their decision on who they believed was the most and least deserving of winning.

What made Without Prejudice so intriguing was that the contestants' identities were kept hidden from the panel throughout the game. The panel had no idea if they were judging a doctor or a criminal, a millionaire or someone struggling to make ends meet. This added a layer of mystery and suspense to the show as well as allowing the panel to judge the players based solely on their answers and conduct.

Without Prejudice also tackled some difficult and controversial topics, such as racism, sexism and politics. The contestants were given questions that were both challenging and thought-provoking, and they were encouraged to debate and express their opinions on these topics. The panel would then judge how they handled the questions, giving viewers an insight into how different people approach controversial topics.

The show was also notable for its diverse casting. The contestants were chosen from a wide range of backgrounds and occupations, and it was refreshing to see people from all walks of life competing on the same stage. The show was praised for its efforts in promoting diversity and challenging prejudices.

Overall, Without Prejudice was a fascinating and engaging game show that offered viewers something different from the traditional quiz show formula. It was a show that challenged stereotypes, tackled tough topics, and gave contestants a chance to showcase their knowledge, debating skills, and personal beliefs. While it may have only run for two seasons, it's clear that Without Prejudice had a lasting impact on the world of game shows and reality TV.