Judge Mathis Season 16 Episode 84 Episode 84

Judge Mathis is a popular TV show that revolves around the comical and yet serious disputes between parties that come to the court from different walks of life. Each episode is packed with situations that are not only entertaining but also highlight the different issues that people face in their daily lives. Season 16 episode 84 of Judge Mathis is named Episode 84.

As with any episode of Judge Mathis, this one too has two parties that are in dispute and have come before Judge Mathis to resolve their issues. The parties are given an opportunity to present their case before the Judge, who listens carefully to each of them, asks questions, and at times offers advice. Through this process, the Judge tries to understand the cause of the conflict, the perspective of each party, and come to a fair resolution.

The participants vary in their backgrounds, with some being from low-income neighborhoods, while others are from affluent families. The disputes are related to money, relationships, business transactions, and even pet custody! Through the course of the show, the Judge examines each case with impartiality and a keen sense of humor, making the proceedings engaging and insightful.

The episode starts with the introduction of the parties and the issue they are facing. The first party is an individual who is suing their roommate over unpaid rent. They claim that they have repeatedly asked the roommate to pay their share of the rent, but they have failed to do so. The roommate, on the other hand, claims that there were significant issues with the apartment that needed to be fixed, and the landlord had not acted on them. This delay, according to him, was the reason why rent remained unpaid.

The Judge hears both parties carefully and asks them relevant questions to understand the situation better. He even takes help from the legal team to clarify some points. After a thorough examination of the case, the Judge decides that the roommate needs to pay the back rent and the remaining amount should be paid according to a payment plan observed quarterly.

The next case is about a dispute between a business owner and a former employee. The business owner had hired the employee for several years but had to terminate them due to poor work performance and other issues. The employee believes that their termination was unfair and that they were not given any prior warning about the possibility of being fired.

The Judge carefully listens to both parties and even allows the employee to explain their situation in detail. The Judge finds out that the business owner had tried to provide warnings, but the employee had failed to improve, which made termination the only possible recourse. The Judge rules in favor of the business owner, stating that the termination was lawfully executed and the employee has no right to claim damages.

The last case of Episode 84 is about a dispute over a pet dog. The plaintiffs are a couple who claim to have been wrongfully deprived of their dog. They explain that the dog was given to them by the defendant, who later took it back on the pretext of taking the dog to the vet. However, they were not informed that the defendant had moved out of the city with the dog and was not planning to return it.

The defendant, on the other hand, explains that the dog was hers and that she was only temporarily housing it with the couple until she could find a more permanent arrangement. She also claims that she had informed the couple about her plans, but they had failed to respond.

Through a series of questions, the Judge finds out that the defendant had no legal right to take the dog back and that the couple had been in custody of the pet for a reasonable duration. He orders that the dog be returned to the couple, and the defendant is prohibited from claiming custody in the future.

In conclusion, episode 84 of Judge Mathis is another exciting installment in this long-running TV show. It showcases a variety of disputes, and the Judge offers equitable solutions to each of them. The episode highlights how a small disagreement can escalate into a full-blown argument and how an unbiased, humorous, and wise adjudicator can make all the difference.