Judge Mathis Season 17 Episode 33 Episode 33

Judge Mathis is a courtroom reality show that sees the honorable Judge Greg Mathis adjudicating various cases brought before him. The show's latest season, season 17, has been thrilling audiences with its heated debates, emotional testimonies, and fair but stringent judgments. Episode 33 of season 17 is no different.

The episode is titled "Episode 33", and it opens with the judge entering the courtroom as his bailiff, Brendan, announes the first case of the day. The plaintiff is Jennifer, a young woman who's suing her former landlord, Mr. Johnson, for withholding her security deposit after she moved out of her apartment. Jennifer explains that she lived in the apartment for a year, during which she made sure to keep everything in order and leave the place in excellent condition, just as she found it when she moved in.

However, upon moving out, Mr. Johnson kept her security deposit on the grounds that she had damaged the apartment's carpet with a spill. Jennifer vehemently denies causing any such damage, arguing that the carpet was already stained when she moved in and hadn't been cleaned or replaced since.

Mr. Johnson, on the other hand, insists that the carpet was pristine when Jennifer moved in and that it was her recklessness that caused the damage, which he claims cost him several hundred dollars to replace. He produces a receipt from a carpet cleaning service, which he says is proof of the damage Jennifer caused.

Judge Mathis listens carefully to both sides of the story, examining the evidence presented and probing the witnesses' statements. He notes that Mr. Johnson's receipt only shows that the carpet was cleaned, not that it was replaced, and asks why he didn't keep an itemized list of the alleged damage and repair costs.

Jennifer, for her part, produces pictures of the apartment she took when she moved in and when she moved out, clearly showing that the carpet was already stained and discolored in the exact same spot where Mr. Johnson claims she caused the damage. She also points out that Mr. Johnson didn't conduct a walk-through inspection of the apartment with her before she moved out, which is a violation of landlord-tenant law in many states.

After hearing all the evidence and arguments, Judge Mathis renders his verdict, citing the lack of concrete evidence on Mr. Johnson's part and the overwhelming evidence in Jennifer's favor. He orders Mr. Johnson to pay Jennifer the full amount of her security deposit plus interest and admonishes him for his poor record-keeping and lack of diligence in maintaining the apartment.

The next case before Judge Mathis involves a dispute between two friends, Lisa and Erica, who both claim ownership of a pet dog named Sparky. Lisa says she bought the dog from a breeder and has been taking care of him for over a year, while Erica claims that Lisa gave her the dog as a gift and that she's been the primary caregiver for the dog.

The two women present conflicting stories about how the dog came into each other's possession, with Lisa arguing that Erica stole the dog from her, while Erica maintains that Lisa willingly gave her the dog as a gift and has no right to take him back.

Judge Mathis asks each woman to provide proof of ownership, such as the dog's registration papers or vet records. Lisa produces documents showing that she purchased the dog and has been taking him to the vet regularly, while Erica produces pictures and video recordings of the dog in her care, including shots of her feeding him, playing with him, and taking him on walks.

As the case unfolds, it becomes clear that the two women had a falling out over personal issues unrelated to the dog and that their dispute is more about their strained relationship than about the dog's ownership. Judge Mathis listens to both women's grievances and offers them some advice on how to resolve their issues outside of court.

In the end, he rules that Lisa is the rightful owner of the dog, citing the purchase documents and the fact that Erica had no legal claim to the dog. However, he encourages the two women to work out a shared custody arrangement if they can, emphasizing the importance of putting the dog's well-being first.

Overall, episode 33 of Judge Mathis is another compelling installment of this long-running courtroom drama. The cases presented are relatable, the witnesses are engaging, and the judge's rulings are fair and just. Fans of the show won't want to miss this exciting episode.