Judge Mathis Season 17 Episode 9 Episode 9

Judge Mathis is an American syndicated court show which features Judge Greg Mathis presiding over various legal cases in a no-nonsense and entertaining manner. In Season 17, Episode 9, Judge Mathis is presented with a dispute between a landlord and a tenant.

The episode begins with the plaintiff, Mr. John, a landlord, who is suing his former tenant, Ms. Daniels, for damages to his property. According to the plaintiff, Ms. Daniels failed to take proper care of the property and caused significant damage during her tenancy. He claims that the damage caused an estimated $5,000 worth of repairs, which he expects the defendant to pay for.

Ms. Daniels, the defendant, contests the allegations made by the plaintiff. She claims that the damages were pre-existing before she moved in and that the landlord was aware of the issues before he leased the property to her. Ms. Daniels is adamant that she did not cause any damages to the plaintiff's property and that she should not be held responsible for any repairs.

As the case unfolds, Judge Mathis listens to the arguments made by both parties and examines the evidence presented. He questions the plaintiff about the terms of the lease agreement and whether he had conducted a thorough inspection of the property before leasing it to the defendant. The judge also probes the defendant's knowledge of the damages to the property and whether she informed the landlord of them when she moved in.

Based on the evidence presented, Judge Mathis concludes that there was a lack of due diligence from both sides in the lease agreement. He rules in favor of the plaintiff, but reduces the amount of damages awarded. The defendant is ordered to pay $2,500 for the repairs to the property, which Judge Mathis deems to be reasonable.

Later in the episode, another case presented to Judge Mathis involves a man suing his former friend for damaging his car in a hit-and-run incident. The plaintiff claims that his friend caused significant damage to his vehicle, but failed to pay for the repairs. The defendant, in turn, denies the allegations and argues that he was not involved in the alleged incident.

Judge Mathis carefully examines the evidence and questions both parties to determine the truth of the matter. He asks the plaintiff to provide proof of the damage caused, through photographs and receipts for repairs. The defendant is asked to provide a detailed account of his whereabouts during the time of the incident.

After analyzing the evidence presented by both sides, Judge Mathis concludes that the plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. He reasons that without conclusive proof of the damages, it would be difficult to hold the defendant responsible. The judge dismisses the case, much to the disappointment of the plaintiff.

In conclusion, Season 17, Episode 9 of Judge Mathis presents two contrasting cases, with unique legal issues. Judge Mathis expertly navigates both cases, using his years of experience and knowledge of the law to provide fair and just rulings. The episode serves as a reminder of the importance of due diligence and honesty in legal proceedings and highlights the role that judges can play in resolving disputes in an impartial and efficient manner.