Ep 16. Quid Pro Quo

In Blue Bloods season 3 episode 16, entitled "Quid Pro Quo," we see the Reagan family tackle another string of cases. This episode opens with Frank Reagan (Tom Selleck) heading to a meeting with other police commissioners to discuss a new gun control initiative. Meanwhile, his son Danny (Donnie Wahlberg) is investigating a hit and run case, in which a wealthy woman's daughter was killed.

As Danny investigates the case, he discovers that the woman's husband is a powerful CEO who may have used his wealth and influence to cover up the crime. Danny must navigate through the politics and his own conscience as he considers a "quid pro quo" arrangement with the CEO in order to make sure justice is served.

Simultaneously, Jamie (Will Estes) is working undercover to bust a group of corrupt cops who are selling drugs. While Jamie is deep undercover, his partner is killed, forcing Jamie to act quickly and improvise in order to maintain his cover.

Meanwhile, Erin (Bridget Moynahan) is trying to prosecute a rapist who claims he has diplomatic immunity. Erin is determined to get justice for the victim, but finding a way to hold the rapist accountable proves to be difficult. In addition to these cases, we see the family continuing to handle their own personal challenges, including Danny struggling to reconcile with his ex-wife and Jamie navigating his new relationship.

As the Reagans tackle these cases, they are faced with ethical dilemmas and must decide whether they should bend the rules to obtain justice. The episode explores the complexities of the criminal justice system and the impact of influence, power, and politics on the pursuit of justice. The family dynamic is also highlighted as the Reagans lean on each other for support during their individual struggles.

"Quid Pro Quo" is a suspenseful episode that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats. The multi-layered plot and strong performances from the cast make for a compelling watch. The episode ultimately leaves the viewer considering the question of whether it's ever acceptable to compromise one's values in the pursuit of justice.