Judge Judy Season 17 Episode 214 Smashed Windshield; Financial Friendship

On episode 214 of season 17 of Judge Judy, titled "Smashed Windshield; Financial Friendship", two separate cases come before the judge.

In the first case, the plaintiff brought a suit against her former roommate for damaging her car. The plaintiff claims that one evening after work she returned home to find her car's windshield completely shattered. She believes her former roommate is responsible and is seeking $2,000 for the damages. The defendant, however, claims she had nothing to do with it and suggests that perhaps someone else in the neighborhood is responsible. Judge Judy hears both sides of the story and makes a ruling based on the evidence presented.

In the second case, the plaintiff is suing her former best friend for a loan that was not repaid. The plaintiff claims she lent her friend $2,500 for a down payment on a car with the agreement that it would be repaid within a year. The plaintiff asserts that the friend only made one small payment and never repaid the remainder of the loan. The defendant argues that there was no set repayment plan and that the plaintiff was simply giving her money as a gift. Judge Judy must review the evidence and make a ruling in this case as well.

Throughout both cases, Judge Judy provides her trademark no-nonsense approach to justice and does not shy away from calling out any lies or manipulation. She demands a high standard of proof from both parties and does not hesitate to ask tough questions to ensure she has a clear understanding of what occurred.

As the episode progresses, viewers will see the tension rise as the litigants become more and more frustrated with each other. Judge Judy's firm guidance and unwavering commitment to justice ensures that the cases are resolved in a fair and just manner, leaving both parties satisfied with the outcome.

Overall, "Smashed Windshield; Financial Friendship" is a typical episode of Judge Judy that showcases the judge's ability to cut through the noise and get to the heart of the matter. Both cases are dealt with in a clear and concise manner, providing viewers with a thrilling glimpse into the legal system.