Judge Judy Season 19 Episode 135 Physical Abuse of the Handicapped?; Sick Puppy 101

In season 19 episode 135 of Judge Judy, the focus is on a case of physical abuse of a handicapped individual. The plaintiff claims that the defendant, her former caretaker, was neglectful and abusive towards her disabled husband. The defendant denies these allegations and insists that she was doing her job properly.

The plaintiff presents evidence of bruises on her husband's body, which she claims were caused by the defendant's mistreatment. She also alleges that the defendant failed to properly administer his medication and neglected to provide him with adequate food and water. The defendant maintains that she did everything within her power to care for the plaintiff's husband and that any injuries he sustained were due to his own clumsiness.

As the case unfolds, it becomes clear that there are conflicting accounts of what actually occurred. Judge Judy is tasked with determining who is telling the truth and who is at fault for this situation. She listens intently to both sides of the story and thoroughly examines the evidence presented.

In addition to the case of physical abuse of a handicapped individual, the episode also features a case involving a sick puppy. The plaintiff claims that she purchased a puppy from the defendant that was sick and ultimately required extensive medical care. She is seeking reimbursement for the costs of the veterinary bills.

The defendant denies any wrongdoing and insists that the puppy was healthy when it was sold to the plaintiff. She suggests that the puppy may have contracted an illness after leaving her possession. Again, Judge Judy must evaluate the evidence presented in order to determine who is at fault in this case.

Ultimately, Judge Judy must weigh the evidence and testimony presented in both cases in order to make a decision. Her rulings in these cases have the potential to impact the lives of the individuals involved in significant ways. Throughout the episode, she demonstrates her characteristic no-nonsense approach to courtroom proceedings, demanding honesty and integrity from all parties involved.