Judge Judy Season 21 Episode 135 Playing House With a Baby!; Bad Tempered Landlord?

In season 21 episode 135 of Judge Judy, titled "Playing House With a Baby!; Bad Tempered Landlord?", viewers are treated to two separate cases being heard in Judge Judy's courtroom. The first case involves a young couple who have been playing house with a baby that is not theirs. They are being sued by the baby's biological father for the cost of a car seat that was purchased for the baby while in the couple's care. The father claims that the couple was not authorized to have the baby and that they should be held responsible for the cost of the car seat. The couple, on the other hand, argues that they were doing the father a favor by taking care of the baby and that he should be grateful.

The second case involves a landlord who is being sued by his former tenant for not returning his security deposit. The tenant claims that the landlord never provided a reason for keeping the deposit and that he has been uncooperative in returning the money. The landlord, however, argues that the tenant caused significant damage to the property and that the deposit was necessary to cover the cost of repairs. Judge Judy must hear both cases and make a decision based on the evidence presented in each.

As the first case unfolds, it becomes clear that the couple was not authorized to have the baby in their care and that they may have been intentionally deceiving the baby's father. The father presents evidence to support his claim, including text messages between him and the couple that show he had asked for the baby back on multiple occasions. The couple, however, maintains that they were just trying to help and that they never intended to harm the baby or her father. In the end, Judge Judy must decide whether the couple should be held liable for the cost of the car seat and whether they should be allowed to continue playing house with the baby.

In the second case, the landlord presents extensive evidence of the damage caused by the tenant, including pictures of holes in the walls and broken appliances. The tenant, however, argues that the landlord is exaggerating the damage and that he has been unresponsive in providing detailed information about the repairs needed. Judge Judy must review the evidence and make a decision about whether the landlord was justified in keeping the security deposit or whether he should be required to return the money to the tenant.

Throughout the episode, Judge Judy demonstrates her trademark no-nonsense approach to courtroom proceedings, asking tough questions of both parties and carefully analyzing the evidence presented. She also provides her signature humorous commentary, making the episode an entertaining and engaging experience for viewers. Ultimately, Judge Judy must decide which parties are in the right in both cases and issue her final rulings, providing justice and closure for those involved.