Judge Judy Season 21 Episode 174 Don't Be a Selfish Parent!; Paint Job or Scam Job?

In season 21, episode 174 of Judge Judy, viewers are presented with two distinct cases that test the limits of common sense and decency. The first case involves a mother and daughter who are suing the father of their children for a multitude of offenses, including child support arrears and failure to provide adequate care. The mother argues that the father has been neglecting their children by failing to pay child support consistently and refusing to help with medical bills, school expenses, and other essential needs. The daughter chimes in, alleging that her father is more interested in partying and dating than parenting, and that he has repeatedly missed important events in her life.

Judge Judy listens patiently to both sides of the argument, and makes it clear that she has little patience for parents who neglect their children. She lambastes the father for his selfish behavior, and orders him to pay the outstanding child support and take more responsibility for his children. Throughout the case, Judge Judy emphasizes the importance of being a responsible parent, and highlights the emotional toll that neglect can take on children.

The second case revolves around a dispute over a paint job. A woman claims that she hired a contractor to paint the exterior of her house, but that the job was not done properly and that the contractor refused to fix the mistakes. Additionally, she claims that the contractor stole some of her belongings, including a ladder and a hose, during the course of the job. The contractor, meanwhile, claims that he fulfilled his obligations and that the woman is simply trying to dodge payment.

Judge Judy examines the evidence closely, including photos of the paint job and the missing items, and determines that the contractor is at fault. She orders him to return the missing items and reimburse the woman for the cost of the paint job, as well as any other damages incurred.

Throughout both cases, Judge Judy demonstrates her trademark no-nonsense approach to judging, cutting through the emotional drama and getting to the heart of each dispute. She offers strong opinions and clear rulings, demonstrating her expertise and authority in the courtroom. By the end of the episode, viewers are left with a clear sense of justice having been served, and a renewed appreciation for the importance of honesty, integrity, and responsibility in all aspects of life.