Judge Judy Season 22 Episode 331 Damning Vandalism and Theft Caught on Tape?!; Don't Call My Antiques Junk!

In this episode of Judge Judy, titled "Damning Vandalism and Theft Caught on Tape?!; Don't Call My Antiques Junk!", two cases are brought before Judge Judy. The first case involves a landlord and tenant dispute over an apartment that was left in a state of disrepair and vandalism. The landlord claims that the tenant and his friends destroyed the apartment, causing thousands of dollars in damages. However, the tenant claims that he had nothing to do with the vandalism and that the landlord is trying to frame him for it.

In order to prove his innocence, the tenant brings in security camera footage from the building that shows someone else committing the vandalism. Judge Judy carefully considers the evidence and ultimately rules in favor of the tenant, ordering the landlord to return his security deposit and pay for any damages that were not caused by the tenant.

The second case involves a dispute between two friends over the value of some antique furniture that was given to one of them by a deceased family member. The friend who received the furniture claims that it is valuable and should not be considered junk, while the other friend insists that it is worthless and should be thrown away.

Judge Judy decides to bring in an expert appraiser to determine the true value of the antique furniture. After examining the pieces and doing some research, the appraiser concludes that the furniture is indeed quite valuable and should not be thrown away. Judge Judy rules in favor of the friend who received the furniture, ordering the other friend to return it to her and pay her for any damages that were done to it.

Throughout the episode, Judge Judy remains firm and impartial, carefully considering all of the evidence presented to her. She does not tolerate any nonsense or lies from either party and is always quick to cut through any attempts at obfuscation. Ultimately, she provides a fair and just resolution to both cases, demonstrating her expertise and experience as a judge.