Ep 370. Illegal Power Rip-Off!; Wage Garnishment Travesty!

In season 22, episode 370 of Judge Judy, titled "Illegal Power Rip-Off!; Wage Garnishment Travesty!," viewers are taken through two cases of individuals facing legal issues regarding their finances.

In the first case, a man is accusing his former landlord of stealing his electricity. The plaintiff claims that the defendant, who owns the building he used to reside in, was running an illegal electrical line from a neighboring building. The accused landlord denies these allegations and claims that she had nothing to do with the electricity theft. As Judge Judy questions the two parties, she finds inconsistencies in both of their stories. She ultimately has them provide evidence, including photographs and receipts, to support their arguments. The evidence presented is scrutinized thoroughly, and Judge Judy points out any issues that arise in the evidence provided. In the end, Judge Judy makes a ruling, deciding who is at fault in the electricity case.

In the second case, a man is suing his ex-girlfriend for wage garnishment resulting from unpaid child support. The plaintiff claims that he was paying child support to the defendant and had provided proof of payments but was still having his wages garnished. The defendant argues that the plaintiff had missed several payments and that she had the right to garnish his wages. Again, Judge Judy is tasked with examining evidence, including the plaintiff's paperwork that shows proof of payment. As the plaintiff presents his case, he becomes agitated, and Judge Judy has to intervene to bring the focus back to the evidence. Judge Judy makes a decision about the child support case and ensures that justice is served in a fair manner.

Overall, the two cases presented in Judge Judy season 22, episode 370, showcase Judge Judy's ability to examine evidence and make decisions based on the facts at hand. These cases involve complex legal issues that need to be thoroughly examined, but Judge Judy's expertise allows her to make fair rulings that protect both parties' rights.