Judge Judy Season 23 Episode 82 Dual Driving Disaster; Aggressive Accounting

Dual Driving Disaster; Aggressive Accounting is an episode from season 23 of the popular courtroom show Judge Judy. In this particular episode, Judge Judy tackles two separate cases involving very different types of disputes.

The first case centers around a car accident. Two drivers, both of whom are present in the courtroom, were involved in a collision at an intersection. Each driver claims that the other was at fault for the accident, and both are seeking compensation for damages to their respective vehicles.

Judge Judy listens carefully to the accounts of the accident from both parties, examining evidence presented by each side. She scrutinizes the physical damage to the vehicles, as well as photographs taken at the scene of the accident. Ultimately, Judge Judy must determine who was at fault for the collision, and how much each driver should be compensated for damages.

The second case in this episode centers around a dispute between a small business owner and their accountant. The business owner claims that the accountant was negligent in their duties, resulting in financial losses for the business. The accountant argues that they provided all necessary services and were not responsible for any negative financial impact.

Judge Judy once again listens to both sides of the case, examining evidence including financial records and correspondence between the two parties. She scrutinizes the details of the accountant's contract with the business owner, looking for any clauses that may hold the accountant liable for losses. In the end, Judge Judy must determine whether the accountant was negligent in their duties, and whether they should be held accountable for any financial losses incurred by the business.

Overall, Dual Driving Disaster; Aggressive Accounting is a fascinating episode that showcases the breadth of cases that Judge Judy tackles on her show. From car accidents to business disputes, Judge Judy listens carefully to the details of each case and carefully examines the evidence before making her judgment.