Judge Judy Season 24 Episode 84 Family Heirlooms on the Hot Seat!; Foster Cat Dubbed Too Aggressive?!; Buyer Beware of Damaged Home!

In season 24 episode 84 of Judge Judy, titled "Family Heirlooms on the Hot Seat!; Foster Cat Dubbed Too Aggressive?!; Buyer Beware of Damaged Home!", Judge Judy handles three separate cases.

The first case involves a family dispute over the ownership of some precious heirlooms. Two siblings are fighting over who should get to keep the family heirlooms after their mother passed away. The items in question are a dining room set and a jewelry box, both of which hold significant sentimental value for both siblings. Each sibling claims that their mother promised the items to them before she died, and the siblings have been unable to come to a resolution. Judge Judy listens to both sides of the argument and ultimately makes a decision on who gets to keep the heirlooms.

The second case involves a foster cat that was deemed to be too aggressive by its new owner. The plaintiff had recently adopted the cat from a local animal shelter and claimed that it was attacking her and her other pets. She wanted a refund for the adoption fee and compensation for the medical bills that she incurred after the cat scratched her. The defendant, who was the director of the animal shelter, argued that the cat had never shown signs of aggression before and was likely just adjusting to its new surroundings. Judge Judy has to determine whether the plaintiff was justified in returning the cat and whether she should receive a refund and compensation.

The third case involves a homebuyer who purchased a property that he later found out had significant water damage. The plaintiff had purchased the home with the intention of flipping it, but after the sale went through, he discovered that there was extensive water damage that had been covered up with paint. The plaintiff claims that the seller knew about the damage but did not disclose it during the sale. The defendant, who was the seller, argues that he was not aware of the damage and that it was the responsibility of the inspector to report it. Judge Judy has to determine whether the seller was aware of the damage and whether he should be held liable for the cost of repairs.

Throughout the episode, Judge Judy uses her no-nonsense approach to cut through the emotional arguments and get to the heart of each case. She listens carefully to each side and asks probing questions to get all the information she needs to make an informed decision. In each case, Judge Judy delivers a verdict that is fair and reasonable based on the facts presented.