Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 105 Trailer Trauma!; Shopping Spree Madness?

The show Hot Bench season 1 episode 105 titled "Trailer Trauma!; Shopping Spree Madness?" features two cases that are heard by the three judges who make up the hot bench. The first case, "Trailer Trauma!" revolves around a couple, the plaintiffs, who had rented a trailer home from the defendants. The plaintiffs claimed that they had given a security deposit of $500 to the defendants, but when they vacated the premises, the defendants refused to refund the deposit. The defendants claimed that the plaintiffs had damaged the property and hence were not eligible for a refund. The plaintiffs disputed this and demanded their deposit back along with compensation for the damages they had incurred.

The judges questioned both parties and reviewed the evidence presented by them. The plaintiffs provided pictures of the property taken at the time of moving in and moving out, as well as receipts of the payments made by them. The defendants claimed that the plaintiffs had caused the damages and presented pictures of the damages as evidence. Upon examining the evidence presented by both parties, the judges came to a decision.

The second case, "Shopping Spree Madness?" revolved around a woman, the plaintiff, who had bought an expensive necklace from a high-end jewelry store. The plaintiff claimed that the necklace had broken within hours of purchasing it, and when she took it back to the store for a refund, the sales representative refused to refund the amount and instead offered a store credit. The plaintiff refused to accept the store credit and demanded a refund for the broken necklace.

The judges examined the necklace and questioned the plaintiff and the sales representative from the store. The plaintiff claimed that the necklace had been defective and had broken due to no fault of hers. The sales representative claimed that the necklace had been properly inspected and was perfectly fine when sold. They suggested that the plaintiff must have mishandled the necklace, leading to its breakage. The judges, after examining the evidence, came to a decision.

The first case, "Trailer Trauma!"; the judges had concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to the refund of their security deposit along with some compensation for the damages they incurred. They based their decision on the evidence of the pictures and the receipts provided by the plaintiffs. The judges concluded that the defendants had not submitted sufficient evidence to substantiate their claim that the plaintiffs had caused all the damage and hence ordered that they compensate the plaintiffs.

In the second case, "Shopping Spree Madness?" the judges concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a refund for the necklace. They based their verdict on the fact that the necklace had broken within hours of purchase, which indicated that it was defective when sold. The judges held that the sales representative could not prove that the plaintiff had mishandled the necklace leading to its breakage, and hence the plaintiff deserved a full refund as she had demanded.

Overall, the episode "Trailer Trauma!; Shopping Spree Madness?" was an exciting episode that kept the audience engaged throughout. The judges asked the right questions, examined the evidence presented by both parties, and arrived at a fair decision in both cases. It was an excellent example of how legal proceedings could be conducted in a manner that ensured justice for all parties involved.