Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 116 Secret Vacation, Public Break-Up!; ATV Theft or Scam?

In season 1 episode 116 of Hot Bench entitled "Secret Vacation, Public Break-Up!; ATV Theft or Scam?", Judge Tanya Acker presides over a case involving a couple who took a trip to Las Vegas, potentially to work on their relationship, but ended up breaking up in a very public way. The woman claims that the man became violent and aggressive towards her, while the man argues that the woman was emotionally abusive towards him.

As the judges try to get to the bottom of what really happened during the couple's trip, they hear from both sides about what led up to their break-up. The woman describes how the man became increasingly hostile towards her after they arrived in Las Vegas, while the man claims that he was pushed to the breaking point by the woman's constant criticism.

Things take an unexpected turn when the woman accuses the man of stealing an ATV from her parents' property. The man denies the allegation, insisting that he borrowed the ATV with permission and returned it before they left for Las Vegas. The judges must decide whether the man is telling the truth or if he really is guilty of theft.

Meanwhile, Judge Patricia DiMango hears a case involving a woman who claims that she was scammed out of her life savings by an unscrupulous contractor. The woman claims that she hired the contractor to do some repairs on her home, but he never actually did any work and instead took all of her money.

As Judge DiMango tries to sort out the details of the case, she hears from both sides about what happened and what the contractor's intentions were. The woman argues that she was taken advantage of because she is elderly, while the contractor insists that he did everything he was supposed to and that the woman is simply trying to get her money back.

Overall, "Secret Vacation, Public Break-Up!; ATV Theft or Scam?" is a tense and dramatic episode of Hot Bench that will keep viewers on the edge of their seats as they try to figure out what really happened in both of these cases. With high stakes and conflicting accounts from all sides, the judges have their work cut out for them as they try to reach fair and just decisions.