Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 84 Dognapping Drama!; Roommate Rampage

In Hot Bench season 1 episode 84, titled "Dognapping Drama!; Roommate Rampage," Judge Tanya Acker presides over two cases involving conflicts between friends and roommates.

In the first case, a woman claims that her friend and former roommate dognapped her beloved chihuahua. The plaintiff alleges that after she moved out of their shared apartment, her friend refused to let her take her dog with her. Instead, the defendant allegedly took the dog to another state and won't return it. However, the defendant claims that the dog was abandoned and she rescued it. She also argues that she has been taking good care of the pet and doesn't want to give it back to the plaintiff.

Judge Acker listens to both sides and questions their credibility and motives. She tries to unravel the complicated history of their friendship and living arrangements, as well as the legal ownership and custody of the dog. She also evaluates the evidence presented, including photos, texts, and witnesses.

As the case unfolds, tensions rise between the two women, who exchange emotional outbursts and insults. Judge Acker tries to maintain order and fairness, but also shows sympathy and understanding for the plaintiff's attachment to her pet. She ultimately decides who gets custody of the dog and offers some advice to both women about their behavior and choices.

In the second case, two former roommates accuse each other of vandalizing their apartment and stealing each other's property. The plaintiffs and defendants each claim that the other caused damage to the walls, furniture, appliances, and personal items in the apartment after they had a falling out and moved out.

Judge Acker hears both sides and examines the photos and receipts submitted as evidence. She also probes into the nature of their disagreement, which involves accusations of stealing money, food, and clothing. She asks them to explain why they didn't involve the police or a mediator to settle their dispute, and why they decided instead to file a lawsuit in small claims court.

As the case progresses, Judge Acker discovers more inconsistencies and contradictions in their testimonies, as well as some exaggerations and lies. She challenges them to own up to their mistakes and find a more constructive way to resolve their differences. She also evaluates the damages claimed by each party and decides who owes what to whom.

Overall, "Dognapping Drama!; Roommate Rampage" showcases the tricky and sometimes bizarre conflicts that can arise between friends and roommates, and how they can be resolved or exacerbated in court. Judge Acker's no-nonsense, but compassionate approach to judging brings a dose of reality and common sense to the situations.