Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 97 Which Lab Mauled the Shih Tzu?; Harley D. Custody Battle!

Season 1 Episode 97 of Hot Bench explores two very different cases. The first, titled "Which Lab Mauled the Shih Tzu?", revolves around a couple whose beloved dog was attacked by two other dogs while they were on a walk. The couple claims that the owners of the two dogs responsible are liable for their dog's medical bills and emotional distress. The defendants, however, argue that their dogs were not the ones responsible for the attack and that they shouldn't be held responsible for something they didn't do.

The judge presiding over the case, Judge DiMango, takes charge of the situation and asks both sets of owners to provide evidence to back up their claims. She asks the plaintiffs to show evidence that the defendants' dogs were the ones who attacked their dog, and asks the defendants to provide evidence that their dogs didn't do anything wrong. After examining the evidence, Judge DiMango comes up with a verdict that she feels is fair and just.

The second case, titled "Harley D. Custody Battle!", is a custody battle between two parents over their 7-year-old son, Harley. The plaintiff, Harley's mother, argues that she should have primary custody of Harley because she can provide a stable environment for him and has been the primary caregiver throughout his life. The defendant, Harley's father, argues that he should have joint custody of Harley because he has a good relationship with him and has been an active participant in his life.

Judge Acker presides over this case and listens carefully to the arguments of both parties. She asks both parents to provide evidence to support their claims and makes sure that Harley's best interests are front and center in her ruling. Judge Acker takes into account the needs of both parents, as well as Harley's needs, and comes up with a decision that she feels is in the best interests of everyone involved.

Overall, this episode of Hot Bench is an interesting and thought-provoking look at two very different legal cases. Viewers will be on the edge of their seats as they watch both cases unfold and will be intrigued to see how the judges handle the situations.