Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 99 Single Mom vs. Handyman!; High Stakes Hair Restoration

During season 1 episode 99 of Hot Bench, viewers are introduced to two cases that are sure to heat up the courtroom. The first case features a single mother who is suing a handyman for non-payment for incomplete work he performed on her home. The second case revolves around a man who is suing a hair restoration company for damages he claims were incurred due to a botched procedure.

In the first case, the plaintiff claims that she hired the defendant handyman to perform a number of repairs on her home, including fixing a leaky roof and installing new flooring. Despite being paid upfront for the work, the handyman allegedly did not complete the job to the plaintiff's satisfaction and attempted to charge her more money for materials. The plaintiff is seeking reimbursement for the money she paid to the handyman, as well as compensation for the damage caused by his incomplete work.

The defendant, on the other hand, claims that he completed all of the work he was hired to do and that the plaintiff owes him more money for materials and additional work he performed at her request. He also alleges that the plaintiff made the work more difficult by constantly changing her demands and specifications. The presiding judges must consider both sides of the story to determine who is at fault and who is owed money, if anyone.

The second case involves a man who claims that a hair restoration company caused irreparable damage to his scalp during a hair transplant procedure. The plaintiff alleges that the company failed to properly sterilize the equipment used during the procedure, causing him to develop a serious infection and irreversible scarring. He is seeking compensation for the medical costs, as well as damages for the emotional distress caused by the procedure.

The defendant hair restoration company argues that they provided the plaintiff with all necessary information and warnings prior to the procedure. They claim that the plaintiff signed a waiver acknowledging the potential risks of the procedure and that any damage caused was not due to their negligence. The judges must decide whether the hair restoration company is responsible for the plaintiff's injuries and whether they owe him any compensation.

Throughout both cases, the presiding judges drill down into the details and hear testimony from witnesses and experts to determine the truth of each case. As the stakes are high in both cases, the judges strive to make fair and just decisions. The cases are sure to keep viewers on the edge of their seats as they follow along with the legal proceedings and try to determine the outcome.