Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 17 Missing Service Cat Triggers Fight!

In Hot Bench season 2 episode 17 titled "Missing Service Cat Triggers Fight!", Judge Patricia DiMango, Judge Tanya Acker, and Judge Michael Corriero preside over a case that involves a missing service cat.

The plaintiffs, a mother and daughter, filed a lawsuit against the defendant, their former landlord, for allegedly removing their service cat from the apartment without their consent. The mother and daughter claimed that the cat provided emotional support for the daughter, who suffers from anxiety and depression.

The defendant denied any wrongdoing and stated that he did not remove the cat from the apartment. He also argued that the mother and daughter violated the terms of the lease agreement by having a cat in the apartment without his permission.

As the case unfolds, the judges examine the evidence presented by both sides and question the credibility of the witnesses. They also attempt to determine whether the cat was indeed a trained service animal or simply a pet.

Throughout the episode, tensions run high as emotions flare between the parties and the judges attempt to maintain order in the courtroom. The judges must also navigate the complex legal issues surrounding the use of service animals and determine whether the landlord's actions violated any laws or agreements.

Overall, "Missing Service Cat Triggers Fight!" is a compelling legal case that explores the relationships between landlords, tenants, and service animals. The episode highlights the important role that emotional support animals can play in the lives of those who rely on them and raises questions about the responsibilities of landlords in accommodating these animals.