Hot Bench Season 3 Episode 60 Credit Score Rehab!; Flirty T-Shirt Designer?!
- November 3, 2016
In season 3 episode 60 of Hot Bench titled "Credit Score Rehab!; Flirty T-Shirt Designer?!", Judge Patricia DiMango, Judge Tanya Acker, and Judge Michael Corriero preside over two cases with challenging circumstances.
The first case features a plaintiff who claims that his credit score has been ruined due to an error on his credit report. He seeks compensation from the credit bureau and the original creditor for damages caused by their inaccurate reporting. However, the defendants argue that the plaintiff is responsible for the debt and that his credit score accurately reflects his payment history.
As the judges hear testimony and examine evidence, they must decide whether or not the plaintiff's case has merit and if he is entitled to compensation for damages caused by the defendants' reporting.
The second case involves a flirty t-shirt designer who claims that a former business partner stole her designs and used them to launch a successful clothing line. The plaintiff seeks compensation for damages caused by the defendant's alleged theft of intellectual property.
However, the defendant argues that the designs are not original and were created by an employee of the company. The defendant further claims that the plaintiff's behavior was unprofessional and that it damaged the reputation of the business.
As the judges examine the evidence and hear testimony from both sides, they must determine whether or not the plaintiff's designs are original and whether or not she is entitled to compensation for damages caused by the defendant's alleged theft.
Throughout the episode, the judges provide insightful commentary and ask detailed questions to help them reach a fair judgment. Viewers are treated to a compelling legal drama that highlights the complexities of the law and the human stories behind each case.
With its engaging cases and expert legal analysis, season 3 episode 60 of Hot Bench is sure to keep viewers on the edge of their seats as they watch the judges weigh evidence and make difficult decisions.