Hot Bench Season 3 Episode 92 Children Injured by Mold Outbreak?!; Demolition 101

In season 3 episode 92 of Hot Bench, the show presents two cases for judge Judy Sheindlin and her three judges panel. The first case is about children who suffered from injuries caused by mold in their residence. The plaintiff, a mother, sues the landlords of her rental home for negligence after she discovered that her son had been exposed to mold and suffered a respiratory condition. According to the plaintiff, the landlords did nothing to address the mold issue despite multiple complaints. The defense, on the other hand, claims that the mold outbreak was caused by the plaintiff's own negligence in maintaining the property. As the legal arguments unfold, the judges must decide who is at fault for the unfortunate incident.

The second case in season 3 episode 92 of Hot Bench is titled "Demolition 101." It involves a contractor who was hired to demolish a garage but ended up damaging the nearby house due to inadequate safety measures. The plaintiff, a homeowner, sues the contractor for the cost of damages to his property. According to the plaintiff, the contractor did not follow the safety regulations and caused damage to the roof, windows, and gutters of his house. The defense, on the other hand, argues that the homeowner had prior knowledge of the demolition and should have taken measures to protect his property. As both parties contest their sides, the judges have the tough job of deciding who is liable for the damage caused.

Season 3 episode 92 of Hot Bench brings forth two cases that explore the concept of liability and negligence. Both cases present varying views on what is considered an accident and what can be attributed to human negligence. Through intense legal arguments, the judges will determine the outcome of both cases and deliver their verdicts.