The People's Court Season 17 Episode 22 You Said You'd Make My Son a Star

In episode 22 of season 17 of The People's Court, titled "You Said You'd Make My Son a Star," a mother takes legal action against a talent manager who promised to make her son a famous actor but failed to deliver.

The episode starts with the plaintiff, a mother named Jessica, explaining that her son had been interested in acting since he was a child and that she had invested a lot of money in his acting classes and headshots. She then met the defendant, a talent manager named Peter, who promised to get her son auditions for big-name productions and help him make it big in the entertainment industry.

Jessica claims that she paid Peter a fee of $5,000, which was supposed to cover his services for six months. However, despite numerous promises and assurances, Jessica states that Peter failed to secure any auditions for her son or provide any meaningful career advice or connections.

Jessica explains that she tried to get her money back, but Peter refused to refund her. She then decided to take Peter to court in the hopes of getting her money back and holding him accountable for false promises and unethical behavior.

Next, Peter takes the stand and denies all of Jessica's allegations. He claims that he did secure several auditions for her son and even landed him a minor role in a local commercial. Peter insists that he did everything within his power to help Jessica's son succeed, but that he was unable to secure any bigger opportunities due to the highly competitive nature of the industry.

Peter also argues that Jessica failed to follow his advice and make the necessary investments in her son's career, such as hiring a professional acting coach or upgrading his headshots. He suggests that Jessica was simply impatient and unrealistic about her son's prospects in the industry and that she is now trying to blame him for her own shortcomings.

After hearing both sides of the case and evaluating the evidence presented, the judge must determine whether Peter did indeed make false promises or act unethically, and whether Jessica is entitled to a refund or other compensation.

Throughout the episode, tensions run high as both parties become emotional and defensive. The judge must navigate through the conflicting testimonies and evidence to come to a fair and just conclusion.

Ultimately, viewers will have to tune in to find out the judge's ruling and whether justice has been served in this case of broken promises and dashed dreams.