Hot Bench Season 1 Episode 11 Racial Slurs and Bigotry; Homeless Widow Woes

In season 1 episode 11 of Hot Bench titled "Racial Slurs and Bigotry; Homeless Widow Woes," Judge Tanya Acker presides over a case involving an alleged racial slur used against a tenant by their landlord. The plaintiff claims that the defendant used a racial slur while threatening to evict them from their apartment. The defendant denies these allegations and claims that the plaintiff is lying.

As the case unfolds, Judge Acker questions both parties and their witnesses to get to the bottom of what really happened. In the end, Judge Acker renders her verdict based on the evidence presented in court.

In the second case, Judge Patricia DiMango hears a case involving a homeless widow who claims that she was defrauded by a contractor who promised to build her a home. The plaintiff claims that she paid the defendant upfront for his services but he never delivered on his promises.

As Judge DiMango listens to both sides of the case, she tries to determine whether the defendant was truly negligent or if the plaintiff is simply trying to recoup her losses. In the end, Judge DiMango delivers her verdict and provides guidance for both parties on how they can avoid similar issues in the future.

Overall, "Racial Slurs and Bigotry; Homeless Widow Woes" is an intense episode of Hot Bench, as both cases involve individuals who feel wronged and are seeking justice. The judges use their legal expertise to ensure that each party is heard and that the truth is revealed, making for a compelling and thought-provoking episode.