Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 113 McDonald's Drive-Thru Fail!; Doggie Lawyer to the Rescue!

In Hot Bench season 2 episode 113, titled "McDonald's Drive-Thru Fail!; Doggie Lawyer to the Rescue!", Judge Tanya Acker, Judge Patricia DiMango, and Judge Michael Corriero return to preside over two more cases.

The first case involves a woman who is suing McDonald's after a drive-thru incident. The plaintiff claims that she ordered a breakfast sandwich and a coffee, but was given a cheeseburger and a soda instead. When she returned to the drive-thru to complain, the employee allegedly became belligerent and threw the coffee at her car, causing burns and damage. The defendant, McDonald's, argues that the plaintiff did not order a breakfast sandwich and that the employee was not responsible for any damages. The judges must determine who is at fault in this dispute.

The second case involves a woman who is representing her dog in a lawsuit against her neighbor. The plaintiff claims that her dog was injured when the neighbor's dog attacked him while they were both playing in the front yard. The defendant argues that her dog was not the aggressor and that the plaintiff's dog was at fault for provoking the attack. The plaintiff, who is representing her dog herself, argues that the neighbor is responsible for the medical bills and emotional distress that her dog has suffered. The judges must decide whether the plaintiff's dog was a victim or a provocateur in the incident.

As always, the judges hear both sides of each case, ask tough questions, and come to a final decision. Hot Bench is a unique courtroom show where three judges with diverse legal backgrounds work together to provide a final verdict that is fair and just. Tune in to see who will come out on top in these two cases.