Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 120 Disappearing Jewelry Scam? Snake Owner Charmer?

In season 2, episode 120 of Hot Bench, the judges hear two separate cases. First, a woman claims that her jewelry disappeared after she left it in the care of a self-proclaimed "snake owner charmer." She alleges that the man took advantage of her trust and stole the jewelry. However, the defendant argues that the woman never gave him any jewelry to watch over and that she is simply looking for a way to get some money out of him.

The judges listen carefully to both sides of the story and examine the evidence provided, including photos and text messages between the two parties. They try to determine who is telling the truth and if there is any legal action that can be taken in this case.

In the second case, a woman is suing her former landlord for refusing to return her security deposit. The landlord argues that the woman caused damage to the property during her tenancy, and therefore the deposit was rightfully withheld. However, the woman disputes these claims and presents evidence that the damage was pre-existing and not caused by her.

The judges hear testimony from both sides, including a contractor who was hired to repair the alleged damage. They also examine photographs of the property before and after the woman's tenancy, as well as the terms of the lease agreement. Ultimately, they must decide whether the landlord was justified in withholding the deposit or if it should be returned to the woman.

As always, the judges provide insightful commentary and legal analysis throughout both cases, offering their expertise on the law and the unique circumstances of each situation. Viewers will be on the edge of their seats as they wait to see how the judges will rule in each case in season 2, episode 120 of Hot Bench, titled "Disappearing Jewelry Scam? Snake Owner Charmer?"