Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 185 Car Swap Swindle?; Homeless Boyfriend Trouble?; An Act of God or Dog?!

In season 2, episode 185 of Hot Bench, viewers are presented with three cases in front of the panel of judges.

The first case, "Car Swap Swindle," involves a man who claims that he traded a car for another vehicle but later discovered that the new car was in worse condition than the previous one. The man accuses the other party of fraudulently misrepresenting the car they were trading. However, the other party suggests that the car was in good condition at the time of the trade and that the issues arose after the trade took place. The judges must determine who is responsible for the car's condition and who is at fault for any damages incurred.

The second case, "Homeless Boyfriend Trouble," features a woman who filed a restraining order against her homeless boyfriend. The woman claims that she allowed her boyfriend to stay with her temporarily, but he refused to leave and became physically abusive towards her. The boyfriend maintains that the woman was aware of his situation and that he never laid a hand on her. The judges must determine whether or not the woman's claims hold any merit or if the boyfriend's testimony can be believed.

The final case, "An Act of God or Dog?!," involves a woman who is suing a corporation after a large tree fell on her car in a parking lot. The woman suggests that the tree was not properly maintained and that the corporation should be held liable for the damages to her vehicle. However, the corporation argues that the tree fell due to an act of God, namely extreme weather conditions, and that they could not have foreseen the occurrence. The judges must determine if the corporation could have taken measures to prevent the incident or if it was truly an act of God.

Overall, season 2, episode 185 of Hot Bench provides viewers with a diverse range of cases that showcase the various issues that can arise when individuals make deals, live with others, or interact with corporations. Through the judges' legal expertise and inquisitive questioning, viewers are treated to a balanced and fair exploration of each case, highlighting how complex legal cases can be.