Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 34 Courtroom Turned Petting Zoo!

In the Hot Bench season 2 episode 34 titled Courtroom Turned Petting Zoo!, Judge Tanya Acker presides over a bizarre case involving a dispute between a landlord and his tenant over a petting zoo. The tenant, who runs a business of providing petting zoos for children's parties, had rented a property from the landlord to house his animals. However, there were several incidents where the animals escaped and caused damage to neighboring properties.

The landlord claims that the tenant did not properly secure the property and is liable for the damages caused by the animals. On the other hand, the tenant argues that the landlord knew about the nature of his business and should have made necessary arrangements to ensure the safety of the animals and prevent them from escaping.

The judges, including Judge Patricia DiMango and Judge Michael Corriero, hear both sides of the argument and question the witnesses to determine the responsibility of each party. They weigh the evidence and testimonies of the landlord, tenant, and other witnesses to make a decision.

As the case progresses, it becomes clear that the dispute goes beyond just the damages caused by the animals. The tenant claims that the landlord has been harassing him by making false claims and trying to sabotage his business. The judges have to consider this evidence as well in making their final decision.

The case takes a lighthearted turn when the tenant brings some of his animals to the courtroom as evidence. Judge Acker allows the animals in the courtroom, and they become the center of attention as the judges and audience members interact with them.

The episode also features a second case involving a dispute over a security deposit between a landlord and a former tenant. The tenant claims that the landlord wrongly kept a portion of her deposit, while the landlord argues that she left the apartment in a state of disrepair.

The judges listen to both sides of the argument and question the witnesses to determine the validity of the claims. They consider the condition of the apartment before and after the tenant's occupancy to determine the appropriate amount of the security deposit that should be returned.

Overall, the episode provides viewers with a glimpse into the legal proceedings of cases that are often overlooked in mainstream media. The judges display their impartiality and expertise in weighing the evidence and making fair decisions. The inclusion of animals in the courtroom adds a unique twist to the proceedings, making for an entertaining and informative viewing experience.