Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 90 Nudie Photo Fail!; Gym Rat Ruckus?

Nudie Photo Fail!; Gym Rat Ruckus? is the 90th episode of the second season of the popular legal series, Hot Bench. In this episode, the honorable judges Judge Patricia DiMango, Judge Tanya Acker, and Judge Michael Corriero preside over two separate cases, one involving a failed attempt to take racy photos and the other a dispute between two gym-goers.

The first case involves a couple who hired a photographer to take provocative photos of the wife. However, the photos turned out to be less than flattering and the couple refused to pay for the services rendered. The couple argues that the photographer breached the contract by not providing them with the desired results and that they were never satisfied with the results. The photographer counterargues that the couple were happy with the photos initially and only decided to renege on the agreement after seeing the bill.

Judge Patricia DiMango, known for her no-nonsense approach to legal cases, challenges the couple's claim and questions why they agreed to pay the amount upfront if they were not satisfied with the work produced. Judge Michael Corriero, as well as Judge Tanya Acker, dig deeper to understand the extent of the approval given by the couple during the process, and whether the photographer lived up to their end of the bargain.

The second case involves a disagreement between two gym enthusiasts who differ in their use of gym equipment. One man claims that the other hogs the equipment and does not allow for other gym-goers to use it. He further accuses the gym rat of stealing his personal belongings from the locker room. The accused gym rat argues that the complainant is interfering with his workout by trying to rush his use of equipment and is infringing on his gym time by hogging the facility for his personal use.

As both parties exchange their accounts of events, Judge Tanya Acker questions the root cause of the disagreement and whether the accused gym rat was wrong in his actions. Judge Michael Corriero questions whether the complainant informed the gym authority of the altercation and whether the gym authority took action to resolve the issue.

Throughout the episode, the judges aim to provide a fair and impartial ruling, taking into account all the facts and evidence presented by both parties. The case holds the essence of the show, which embarks on providing a transparent legal process while examining complex topics in a simple way to the audience.