Hot Bench Season 2 Episode 96 Dog Attack Justified!; Dreadlock Disaster Demo!

In season 2, episode 96 of the show "Hot Bench," two unique cases are brought before the three judge panel. The first case deals with a woman whose dog attacked a man who was trying to climb over her fence to retrieve a lost ball. The woman claims that she was justified in her dog's actions, as it was simply trying to protect their property. However, the victim argues that the attack was unprovoked and has caused him long-lasting physical and emotional damage. The judges must decide whether or not the woman's actions were reasonable and if she should be held responsible for the harm caused by her dog.

In the second case, a woman is suing her hairstylist after a botched hair extension job left her with a head full of dreadlocks. The plaintiff claims that the stylist did not properly apply the extensions and as a result, her hair was severely damaged and tangled beyond repair. She is seeking compensation for the cost of the hair extensions, as well as the cost of repairing the damage. However, the stylist argues that she performed the service to the best of her ability and that the plaintiff did not properly care for her hair after the appointment. The judges must determine who is at fault for the "dreadlock disaster" and if the plaintiff is entitled to any compensation.

As with every episode of "Hot Bench," the judges approach both cases with a critical eye and strive to make a fair and just decision. The three judges each bring their own unique perspectives to the cases, which can sometimes lead to lively debates and disagreements. However, they remain professional and respectful throughout the proceedings, and ultimately work towards finding the truth of each situation. "Hot Bench" continues to be a compelling and informative show, providing viewers with a behind-the-scenes look at the American justice system.