Hot Bench Season 3 Episode 97 Sledgehammered Safe?!; Fancy Phone Foolishness!

In season 3 episode 97 of Hot Bench, titled "Sledgehammered Safe?!; Fancy Phone Foolishness!", the three judges preside over two separate cases that showcase unusual and contentious disputes.

In the first case, a man claims that a neighbor's son broke into his home and attempted to break open a safe with a sledgehammer. The man is seeking damages for the damage to his property. However, the neighbor's son denies any wrongdoing and claims that he was simply helping the man move the heavy safe. As the judges examine the evidence, tensions rise between the two parties.

In the second case, a woman is suing her former friend and business partner for allegedly stealing her idea for a smartphone app and launching it before her. The defendant denies the allegations, stating that the plaintiff was not a part of the development process and therefore has no claim to the idea. The judges must carefully review the evidence presented by both sides to determine who has the rightful claim to the app's idea.

As both cases unfold, the judges struggle to determine the truth behind each situation, as both parties offer conflicting stories. The judges must weigh the evidence presented and apply their legal expertise to make a just decision for each dispute. Will they be able to successfully navigate these complex and contentious cases? Tune in to find out in "Sledgehammered Safe?!; Fancy Phone Foolishness!" on Hot Bench.