Hot Bench Season 4 Episode 27 An $8,000 Payout and I Got Nothing; Insecurity Deposit

In this episode of Hot Bench, Judge Tanya Acker presides over two cases while Judge Michael Corriero and Judge Patricia DiMango provide support and input.

The first case involves two former friends who entered into a financial agreement. The plaintiff lent the defendant $8,000 to pay off a debt, with the agreement that the defendant would pay the plaintiff back in installments. However, the plaintiff claims that the defendant did not make any payments and has not fulfilled her end of the agreement. The defendant argues that she did repay some of the money and that the plaintiff had forgiven the debt. With both parties presenting evidence and witness testimony, it's up to Judge Acker to decide who is telling the truth and who should be held accountable.

The second case centers around a dispute between a tenant and landlord over a security deposit. The plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant but claims that the unit was not in the condition promised and that the defendant did not return the full amount of the security deposit. The defendant argues that the plaintiff left the apartment in an unsatisfactory state and that necessary repairs were made. The judges examine the lease agreement, photos of the unit, and testimony from both sides in order to determine if the landlord was justified in withholding a portion of the security deposit.

As always, tensions run high in these heated courtroom battles. With high stakes on the line and emotions running deep, the judges will have to examine all of the evidence and carefully weigh their options in order to come to a fair and just decision for all parties involved.

Will the former friends make amends and come to a resolution, or will the court rule in favor of one over the other? Will the landlord be held accountable for withholding funds, or will the tenant have to accept a partial refund? Find out in this gripping episode of Hot Bench.