Hot Bench Season 4 Episode 51 Penny-Pinching Millionaire Payback?!; Gay Ex-Lover in Hot Pursuit?!

Penny-Pinching Millionaire Payback?!; Gay Ex-Lover in Hot Pursuit?! is the 51st episode of the 4th season of Hot Bench. In this episode, Judge Acker presides over the case of a wealthy woman who is being sued by her former personal shopper for unpaid wages. The plaintiff claims that the defendant, a self-proclaimed penny-pinching millionaire, owes her over $30,000 for her services. The defendant argues that she never agreed to pay the plaintiff such a high salary and that she should not owe her anything more than the agreed-upon amount. The plaintiff presents evidence of text messages and invoices to support her claim, while the defendant attempts to poke holes in her case.

Judge DiMango hears the case of a gay man who is suing his former lover for the return of his possessions. The plaintiff claims that his ex-boyfriend took several expensive items from his home, including designer clothing, electronics, and jewelry. The defendant admits to taking some of the plaintiff's property but claims that he was entitled to it because he paid for it or received it as gifts. The plaintiff argues that this is not true and that the defendant should return his property immediately.

Judge Corriero hears the final case of the episode, which involves a landlord-tenant dispute. The plaintiff is suing her former landlord for not returning her security deposit after she moved out of her apartment. The defendant argues that the plaintiff left the apartment in a state of disrepair and that he was entitled to keep the deposit to cover the cost of repairs. The plaintiff counters that she left the apartment in good condition and that the defendant is simply trying to keep her money.

Throughout the episode, the judges ask tough questions and provide insightful commentary based on their experiences. They also challenge the litigants to provide evidence and arguments that support their positions. Ultimately, the judges rule on each case and provide explanations for their decisions.