Hot Bench Season 4 Episode 96 I'm a Vampire!; Supportive Bald Dad to the Rescue!

In season 4 episode 96 of Hot Bench, titled "I'm a Vampire!; Supportive Bald Dad to the Rescue!," two unique cases are presented before judges Tanya Acker, Patricia DiMango, and Michael Corriero.

The first case involves a man claiming to be a vampire who is suing his landlord for violating his privacy. The plaintiff alleges that the landlord entered his apartment without permission and took pictures of his blood-splattered walls. He argues that this invasion of privacy is a direct violation of his vampire lifestyle.

The defendant, the landlord, denies the allegations and states that he was simply doing a routine inspection of the property when he saw the blood-splattered walls. He claims he was concerned for the plaintiff's safety and well-being, which is why he took pictures and contacted the authorities.

The judges ask both parties to provide evidence to support their claims, and the plaintiff presents pictures and videos of himself dressed as a vampire and performing various vampire activities in his apartment. The defendant provides logs of his past inspections and contact with the authorities.

Judge Acker questions the plaintiff on his vampire lifestyle and how it relates to the case. Judge DiMango asks the defendant why he did not give the plaintiff notice before entering his apartment. Judge Corriero asks both parties for any additional evidence they may have.

In the second case, a father has filed a lawsuit against his daughter's hairdresser for allegedly damaging her hair. The plaintiff, a bald man, claims that the hairdresser used harsh chemicals on his daughter's hair, causing it to fall out in clumps.

The defendant, the hairdresser, argues that she used the same chemicals she always uses and that the plaintiff's daughter did not follow the proper hair care instructions after the treatment, which resulted in the damage.

The judges ask both parties to provide evidence, and the plaintiff presents pictures of his daughter's hair before and after the treatment. The defendant presents a log of the treatment and the proper hair care instructions given to the plaintiff's daughter.

Judge DiMango questions both parties on the chemicals used and the proper hair care instructions. Judge Corriero asks the plaintiff if he has sought any medical help for his daughter's hair loss. Judge Acker asks the defendant about her qualifications and experience as a hairdresser.

Through their questioning, the judges try to determine whether the hairdresser is liable for the damage to the plaintiff's daughter's hair, and whether the vampire plaintiff's privacy was violated.