Hot Bench Season 5 Episode 21 Vindictive Ex-Wife or Deadbeat Ex-Husband?; Sick Child Fundraiser or the Cruelest of Scams?

In Hot Bench season 5 episode 21, viewers are presented with two different cases that challenge the legal minds of judges Tanya Acker, Patricia DiMango, and Michael Corriero. The first case involves a couple who is dealing with a custody battle over their child. The husband claims that his ex-wife is trying to prevent him from seeing his child, while the wife claims that her husband is a deadbeat dad who has not paid child support in years. As the couple argues in front of the judges, their bitter feelings towards each other come to light and they both seem determined to win custody at any cost. The judges must consider the evidence presented to them and decide which parent should have custody and visitation rights.

The second case centers around a fundraising campaign that was started to raise money for a sick child. The child's parents claim that their son has a rare and life-threatening medical condition, and they are seeking donations to help cover the cost of his treatment. However, a group of individuals have come forward to say that they believe the fundraising campaign is a scam and that the child does not actually have the medical condition that his parents are claiming. The judges must listen to both sides of the argument and determine whether the fundraising campaign is a legitimate effort to help a sick child or a cruel scam that is taking advantage of people's generosity.

Throughout the episode, the judges demonstrate their expertise in family law and their ability to weigh the evidence presented to them in order to make fair and just decisions. They ask probing questions of the litigants and are not afraid to challenge assumptions and assertions made by both sides. Viewers who are interested in legal proceedings and the legal system will find this episode to be fascinating and informative. They will get a glimpse into the challenges that judges face when trying to decide the outcomes of complex and emotionally charged cases, and they will see firsthand just how much work goes into making a legal decision that is based on evidence and legal precedent.