Hot Bench Season 6 Episode 116 Romantic Comedy Goes Bust!; Misleading Dating Profile!

In the season 6 episode 116 of Hot Bench, titled "Romantic Comedy Goes Bust!; Misleading Dating Profile!" two controversial cases are presented before judges Tanya Acker, Patricia DiMango, and Michael Corriero.

In the first case, a couple who met on a dating app are at odds over money. The plaintiff claims that he spent over $1,000 on a romantic weekend getaway with the defendant, which he believes was a step towards a serious relationship. However, the defendant argues that she never intended to pursue a long-term relationship with the plaintiff and was using him just for his money. The judges must determine whether the weekend getaway was a gift or an agreement for a serious relationship.

The second case deals with a landlord/tenant dispute. The plaintiff, a landlord, claims that the defendant caused damages to his property that exceeded the security deposit. However, the defendant argues that the plaintiff misled him by showing him a different unit from the one he eventually rented. The defense also accuses the plaintiff of having a misleading dating profile, which added to the confusion. The judges must decide whether the landlord is responsible for the damages or if the tenant is responsible for any financial loss.

As the judges deliberate on both cases, they use their legal expertise and deliver wisdom to resolve the misunderstandings between the parties. With their unique approach to resolving conflicts, the judges manage to find amicable solutions to these two complex cases.

Overall, this episode of Hot Bench promises to deliver engaging and thought-provoking cases that will keep the viewers on the edge of their seats as the judges seek justice and closure for the plaintiffs and defendants.