Hot Bench Season 6 Episode 73 Stylist Charges More for Oversized Head?!

In season 6 episode 73 of Hot Bench, the case centers around a client who is unhappy with the amount charged by her hair stylist for an oversized head. The plaintiff claims that she was charged $60 for just a haircut, which normally costs $35, and another $60 for flat ironing her hair. She argues that the additional charge was unfair and that she was not informed beforehand that her head was considered oversized. She believes that the stylist should have adjusted the price accordingly based on the size of her head.

The defendant, who is the stylist in question, argues that she did not charge the plaintiff for an oversized head but rather for the length and density of her hair. She believes that her price was fair and that the plaintiff was fully informed of the charges beforehand. The stylist also argues that she has been in the business for over 20 years and has seen all kinds of hair types and sizes, and that her price is consistent with what she charges all clients with similar hair.

As the judges delve deeper into the case, they question both parties about the details of the appointment. They ask the plaintiff whether she was informed of the additional charge and whether she agreed to it. They also ask the stylist about the pricing structure of her services and whether it is common for her to charge extra for longer or thicker hair.

Throughout the episode, the judges provide their insights and opinions on the case. Judge Tanya Acker believes that the plaintiff was not clearly informed of the additional charge and that the stylist should have taken the size of her head into account when determining the price. Judge Patricia DiMango, on the other hand, believes that the stylist was within her rights to charge extra for the length and density of the plaintiff's hair. Judge Michael Corriero tries to find a middle ground, questioning whether it would be fair to charge the same price for all clients regardless of hair type or size.

The judges ultimately make their ruling after carefully considering all of the evidence presented in court. The verdict and the reasoning behind it are revealed at the end of the episode, bringing closure to both parties involved in the case.

Overall, the episode raises important questions about pricing in the beauty industry and the importance of clear communication between clients and service providers. It also highlights the role of judges in resolving disputes and ensuring that justice is served.