Hot Bench Season 6 Episode 95 Funeral Viewing Fail!; The Ostrich Defense

Hot Bench season 6 episode 95, titled "Funeral Viewing Fail!; The Ostrich Defense," presents two intriguing cases that will keep the audience hooked. In the first case, a woman is suing her former friend for crashing her sister's funeral viewing. The plaintiff claims that the defendant showed up at the funeral drunk and started causing a scene, disturbing the peaceful atmosphere of the mourning family. The defendant, on the other hand, argues that she was not drunk and only had one drink at the funeral home. She claims that the plaintiff is exaggerating the situation and that she did not cause any disturbance.

However, the defendant's behavior at the stand raises some serious questions. She seems unsure about the details of the incident and even contradicts herself at times. The judge must determine whether the defendant's behavior at the funeral was disruptive enough to warrant compensation for the plaintiff's distress.

The second case is equally intriguing, as it involves a dispute between two neighbors over an alleged altercation involving an ostrich. The plaintiff claims that the defendant's pet ostrich strayed onto his property and attacked him, causing him physical and emotional distress. The defendant, however, argues that his ostrich could not have possibly attacked the plaintiff, as it is a peaceful animal that has been living on his property for years without any incidents.

The judge must determine the credibility of both parties and decide whether an ostrich could be capable of causing harm to a human being. The case takes an interesting turn when the plaintiff produces a video of the ostrich attacking him, which convinces the judge of the plaintiff's claim.

Overall, Hot Bench season 6 episode 95 is a must-watch for fans of the courtroom drama genre. The two cases presented are unique and engaging, with enough twists and turns to keep the audience on their toes. The show's format, which features three judges making a joint decision, adds an additional layer of complexity and tension to the proceedings. The judges' interactions with each other and with the parties involved create a dynamic and engaging viewing experience.