Hot Bench Season 7 Episode 1 Unwed Mother's Need for Weed?!; Jacked-Up Jacuzzi!

In "Hot Bench" season 7 episode 1, titled "Unwed Mother's Need for Weed?!; Jacked-Up Jacuzzi!", Judge Tanya Acker and Judges Patricia DiMango and Michael Corriero preside over two cases filled with drama, conflict, and surprising twists.

In the first case, a young mother named Courtney is being sued by her former landlord, who claims she damaged his apartment and failed to pay rent. Courtney argues that she had no choice but to smoke marijuana to deal with her depression and anxiety, and that her living conditions were unsafe and unsanitary. The landlord insists that Courtney was a problematic tenant who refused to follow the rules, and that she caused over $6,000 in damages. As the judges probe deeper into the evidence and testimony, they must decide whether Courtney's mental health issues and status as a single mother mitigates her responsibility for the alleged damages.

In the second case, a couple named Jeremy and Britney are suing their contractor, who they allege botched the installation of their new Jacuzzi. According to the couple, the contractor left the tub unsecured, causing it to shift and crack their patio. They also claim that the contractor overcharged them for the installation and failed to complete the job on time. The contractor counters that Jeremy and Britney were difficult to work with, constantly changing their minds about the design and delaying the project. He also insists that the damage to the patio was caused by their own negligence, and that he deserves to be compensated for the work he did complete. As the judges scrutinize the evidence and hear testimony from both sides, they must determine who is responsible for the faulty Jacuzzi and the resulting damage.

Throughout both cases, the judges grapple with how to balance legal obligations with empathy for the parties involved. They must navigate complex issues such as mental health, housing discrimination, and contractual agreements, while ensuring that justice is served. As always, Judge Acker, Judges DiMango, and Corriero provide their unique perspectives and insights into the cases, resulting in engaging and thought-provoking discussions.